Reasons to choose DG-2
Released in 2001, DG-2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 425 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-2
vs Konica Revio KD-300Z
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-238 mm²
Revio KD-300Z- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The Revio KD-300Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DG-2MetricRevio KD-300Z
2.11 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.37 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area11.35 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density8.81 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
425 gWeight167 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-300Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-300Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-300Z has the higher effective resolution. The DG-2 and Revio KD-300Z were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-300Z
Released in 2001, Revio KD-300Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.