Reasons to choose X-Pro3
Released in 2019, X-Pro3 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 497 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro3
vs Ricoh GR III
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
X-Pro3367 mm²
GR III- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The X-Pro3 and GR III have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
X-Pro3MetricGR III
26.1 MPEffective pixels24.24 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.75 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
14.05 µm²Pixel area15.12 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²Pixel density6.61 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
497 gWeight257 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryDB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-Pro3 and GR III have the same sensor area. The GR III has the lighter body. The X-Pro3 has the higher effective resolution. The X-Pro3 and GR III were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GR III
Released in 2019, GR III has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.24 MP effective resolution, and a 257 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.