Reasons to choose E1035
Released in 2008, E1035 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.54 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE E1035
vs GE E1050
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
E103528 mm²
E1050- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 15 mm²
- Relative difference
- 53.2%
The E1035 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
E1035MetricE1050
10.54 MPEffective pixels10.7 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.08 × 4.56
2.01 µmPixel pitch1.61 µm
4.03 µm²Pixel area2.59 µm²
24.82 MP/cm²Pixel density38.59 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight145 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E1035 has the larger sensor area. The E1035 and E1050 have the same body weight. The E1050 has the higher effective resolution. The E1035 and E1050 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E1050
Released in 2008, E1050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.7 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.