Reasons to choose RDC-200G
Released in 2000, RDC-200G has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 500 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh RDC-200G
vs Ricoh RDC-5300
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
RDC-200G21 mm²
RDC-5300- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 9 mm²
- Relative difference
- 44.1%
The RDC-200G has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
RDC-200GMetricRDC-5300
2.2 MPEffective pixels2.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.33 × 4
3.74 µmPixel pitch3.11 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area9.69 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density10.32 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
500 gWeight460 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The RDC-200G has the larger sensor area. The RDC-5300 has the lighter body. The RDC-200G and RDC-5300 have the same effective resolution. The RDC-200G is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RDC-5300
Released in 1999, RDC-5300 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 460 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.