Reasons to choose FE-250
Released in 2007, FE-250 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus FE-250
vs Praktica DCZ 10.1
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
FE-25038 mm²
DCZ 10.1- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The FE-250 and DCZ 10.1 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
FE-250MetricDCZ 10.1
8 MPEffective pixels10.37 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch1.91 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area3.65 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density27.36 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight121 g
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The FE-250 and DCZ 10.1 have the same sensor area. The FE-250 has the lighter body. The DCZ 10.1 has the higher effective resolution. The DCZ 10.1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCZ 10.1
Released in 2009, DCZ 10.1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.37 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.