Reasons to choose Revio C2
Released in 2002, Revio C2 has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 70 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica Revio C2
vs Konica Revio KD-200Z
VS
Sensor area
13 mm²
Revio C221 mm²
Revio KD-200Z- Area ratio
- 1.59:1
- Absolute difference
- 8 mm²
- Relative difference
- 59%
The Revio KD-200Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Revio C2MetricRevio KD-200Z
1.2 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
4.23 × 3.17Sensor5.33 × 4
3.34 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
11.17 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
8.95 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
8.19Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
70 gWeight227 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-200Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio C2 has the lighter body. The Revio KD-200Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio C2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-200Z
Released in 2001, Revio KD-200Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.