Reasons to choose ES95
Released in 2013, ES95 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ES95
vs Samsung WB200F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ES9528 mm²
WB200F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ES95 and WB200F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ES95MetricWB200F
16.1 MPEffective pixels14.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area2 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density49.9 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,280 × 720
90 gWeight226 g
microSD/microSDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
BP70ABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ES95 and WB200F have the same sensor area. The ES95 has the lighter body. The ES95 has the higher effective resolution. The ES95 and WB200F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB200F
Released in 2013, WB200F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 226 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.