Reasons to choose Powerflex 800
Released in 2012, Powerflex 800 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 182 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Powerflex 800
vs Rollei Sportsline 62
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Powerflex 80028 mm²
Sportsline 62- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Sportsline 62 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Powerflex 800MetricSportsline 62
14 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
182 gWeight—
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorage—
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Sportsline 62 has the larger sensor area. The Sportsline 62 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 800 has the higher effective resolution. The Powerflex 800 and Sportsline 62 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 62
Released in 2012, Sportsline 62 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.