Reasons to choose dk 3000
Released in 2004, dk 3000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dk 3000
vs Rollei Prego dp5200
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dk 300025 mm²
Prego dp5200- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The Prego dp5200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dk 3000MetricPrego dp5200
3.14 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.61 µmPixel pitch2.19 µm
6.79 µm²Pixel area4.78 µm²
14.73 MP/cm²Pixel density20.93 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Prego dp5200 has the larger sensor area. The Prego dp5200 has the lighter body. The Prego dp5200 has the higher effective resolution. The dk 3000 and Prego dp5200 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp5200
Released in 2004, Prego dp5200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.