Reasons to choose dk 3000
Released in 2004, dk 3000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dk 3000
vs Rollei dpx 310
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dk 300021 mm²
dpx 310- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The dk 3000 and dpx 310 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
dk 3000Metricdpx 310
3.14 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.61 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
6.79 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
14.73 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dk 3000 and dpx 310 have the same sensor area. The dpx 310 has the lighter body. The dk 3000 has the higher effective resolution. The dpx 310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dpx 310
Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.