Reasons to choose dcx 310
Released in 2005, dcx 310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dcx 310
vs Rollei Prego dp8300
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
dcx 31038 mm²
Prego dp8300- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The dcx 310 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
dcx 310MetricPrego dp8300
3.1 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dcx 310 and Prego dp8300 have the same sensor area. The dcx 310 and Prego dp8300 have the same body weight. The Prego dp8300 has the higher effective resolution. The dcx 310 and Prego dp8300 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp8300
Released in 2005, Prego dp8300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.