Reasons to choose da5324
Released in 2005, da5324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.19 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei da5324
vs Rollei dcx 310
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
da532438 mm²
dcx 310- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The dcx 310 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
da5324Metricdcx 310
5.19 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.19 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
4.79 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
20.89 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dcx 310 has the larger sensor area. The da5324 has the lighter body. The da5324 has the higher effective resolution. The da5324 and dcx 310 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dcx 310
Released in 2005, dcx 310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.