Reasons to choose e-mini
Released in 2001, e-mini has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 60 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica-Minolta e-mini
vs Olympus C-2500 L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
e-mini58 mm²
C-2500 L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The e-mini and C-2500 L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
e-miniMetricC-2500 L
0.3 MPEffective pixels2.3 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
13.91 µmPixel pitch5.03 µm
193.6 µm²Pixel area25.25 µm²
0.52 MP/cm²Pixel density3.96 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
60 gWeight530 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia, Compact Flash
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The e-mini and C-2500 L have the same sensor area. The e-mini has the lighter body. The C-2500 L has the higher effective resolution. The e-mini is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose C-2500 L
Released in 1999, C-2500 L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.