Reasons to choose DG-2
Released in 2001, DG-2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 425 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-2
vs Konica Revio KD-220Z
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-215 mm²
Revio KD-220Z- Area ratio
- 1.41:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 40.6%
The DG-2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DG-2MetricRevio KD-220Z
2.11 MPEffective pixels2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.5 × 3.37
3.18 µmPixel pitch2.75 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area7.58 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density13.19 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
425 gWeight220 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DG-2 has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-220Z has the lighter body. The DG-2 has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-220Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-220Z
Released in 2002, Revio KD-220Z has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.