Reasons to choose JD 1300 D
Released in 2001, JD 1300 D has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 296 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 1300 D
vs Konica Q-M200
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
JD 1300 D31 mm²
Q-M200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 1300 D and Q-M200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
JD 1300 DMetricQ-M200
1.3 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area14.56 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.87 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
296 gWeight340 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery3x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 1300 D and Q-M200 have the same sensor area. The JD 1300 D has the lighter body. The Q-M200 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 1300 D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Q-M200
Released in 1999, Q-M200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 340 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.