Reasons to choose Optima 102
Released in 2009, Optima 102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 102
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 1438m
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10228 mm²
Optima 1438m- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 102 and Optima 1438m have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 102MetricOptima 1438m
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 102 and Optima 1438m have the same sensor area. The Optima 102 has the lighter body. The Optima 102 has the higher effective resolution. The Optima 102 and Optima 1438m were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 1438m
Released in 2009, Optima 1438m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.