Reasons to choose RDC-200G
Released in 2000, RDC-200G has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 500 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh RDC-200G
vs Ricoh RDC-6000
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
RDC-200G31 mm²
RDC-6000- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The RDC-200G and RDC-6000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
RDC-200GMetricRDC-6000
2.2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.74 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
500 gWeight260 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The RDC-200G and RDC-6000 have the same sensor area. The RDC-6000 has the lighter body. The RDC-200G has the higher effective resolution. The RDC-200G and RDC-6000 were both released in 2000. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RDC-6000
Released in 2000, RDC-6000 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.