Reasons to choose Caplio GX200
Released in 2008, Caplio GX200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh Caplio GX200
vs Ricoh GR Digital 3
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
Caplio GX20042 mm²
GR Digital 3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Caplio GX200 and GR Digital 3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Caplio GX200MetricGR Digital 3
12.1 MPEffective pixels10.4 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.87 µmPixel pitch2.02 µm
3.51 µm²Pixel area4.08 µm²
28.49 MP/cm²Pixel density24.49 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight188 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Caplio GX200 and GR Digital 3 have the same sensor area. The GR Digital 3 has the lighter body. The Caplio GX200 has the higher effective resolution. The GR Digital 3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GR Digital 3
Released in 2009, GR Digital 3 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.4 MP effective resolution, and a 188 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.