Reasons to choose JD C 3.1 LI
Released in 2005, JD C 3.1 LI has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD C 3.1 LI
vs Jenoptik JD C 3.1 SL
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
JD C 3.1 LI31 mm²
JD C 3.1 SL- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD C 3.1 LI and JD C 3.1 SL have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD C 3.1 LIMetricJD C 3.1 SL
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.1 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD C 3.1 LI and JD C 3.1 SL have the same sensor area. The JD C 3.1 LI has the lighter body. The JD C 3.1 LI and JD C 3.1 SL have the same effective resolution. The JD C 3.1 LI and JD C 3.1 SL were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD C 3.1 SL
Released in 2005, JD C 3.1 SL has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.