Reasons to choose 1500
Released in 2004, 1500 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord 1500
vs Concord 642
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
150031 mm²
642- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The 1500 and 642 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
1500Metric642
1.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch10.12 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area102.4 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density0.98 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
—Weight84 g
—Storage—
2x AABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The 1500 and 642 have the same sensor area. The 1500 has the lighter body. The 1500 has the higher effective resolution. The 1500 and 642 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose 642
Released in 2004, 642 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 84 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.