Reasons to choose QV-8000SX
Released in 1999, QV-8000SX has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-8000SX
vs Konica Q-M100
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
QV-8000SX17 mm²
Q-M100- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-8000SX and Q-M100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
QV-8000SXMetricQ-M100
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.08 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
3.79 µmPixel pitch4 µm
14.4 µm²Pixel area16 µm²
6.94 MP/cm²Pixel density6.25 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight380 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-8000SX and Q-M100 have the same sensor area. The QV-8000SX has the lighter body. The QV-8000SX has the higher effective resolution. The QV-8000SX is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Q-M100
Released in 1998, Q-M100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.08 MP effective resolution, and a 380 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.