Reasons to choose QV-5700
Released in 2002, QV-5700 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 355 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-5700
vs Casio QV-R3
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
QV-570038 mm²
QV-R3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-5700 and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
QV-5700MetricQV-R3
4.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.78 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
7.73 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
12.93 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
355 gWeight240 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-5700 and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. The QV-R3 has the lighter body. The QV-5700 has the higher effective resolution. The QV-5700 and QV-R3 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R3
Released in 2002, QV-R3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.