Reasons to choose QV-3500EX
Released in 2001, QV-3500EX has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 360 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-3500EX
vs Casio QV-R3
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
QV-3500EX38 mm²
QV-R3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-3500EX and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
QV-3500EXMetricQV-R3
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
360 gWeight240 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-3500EX and QV-R3 have the same sensor area. The QV-R3 has the lighter body. The QV-3500EX and QV-R3 have the same effective resolution. The QV-R3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R3
Released in 2002, QV-R3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.