Reasons to choose QV-2000UX
Released in 1999, QV-2000UX has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-2000UX
vs Casio QV-8000SX
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
QV-2000UX17 mm²
QV-8000SX- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The QV-2000UX has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
QV-2000UXMetricQV-8000SX
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor4.8 × 3.6
4.02 µmPixel pitch3.79 µm
16.17 µm²Pixel area14.4 µm²
6.18 MP/cm²Pixel density6.94 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight320 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-2000UX has the larger sensor area. The QV-2000UX and QV-8000SX have the same body weight. The QV-2000UX has the higher effective resolution. The QV-2000UX and QV-8000SX were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-8000SX
Released in 1999, QV-8000SX has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.