Reasons to choose WB350F
Released in 2014, WB350F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 276 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung WB350F
vs Samsung WB35F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
WB350F28 mm²
WB35F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The WB350F and WB35F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
WB350FMetricWB35F
16.3 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.32 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.75 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
57.27 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,280 × 720
276 gWeight195 g
MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
SLB-10ABatteryBP70A
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The WB350F and WB35F have the same sensor area. The WB35F has the lighter body. The WB350F has the higher effective resolution. The WB350F and WB35F were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB35F
Released in 2014, WB35F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.