Reasons to choose dpx 310
Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dpx 310
vs Rollei Prego da3
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dpx 31021 mm²
Prego da3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The dpx 310 and Prego da3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
dpx 310MetricPrego da3
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.58 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.66 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density15.01 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight167 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dpx 310 and Prego da3 have the same sensor area. The dpx 310 has the lighter body. The Prego da3 has the higher effective resolution. The dpx 310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego da3
Released in 2004, Prego da3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.