Reasons to choose e-mini D
Released in 2001, e-mini D has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica-Minolta e-mini D
vs Konica-Minolta e-mini M
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
e-mini D58 mm²
e-mini M- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The e-mini D and e-mini M have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
e-mini DMetrice-mini M
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
13.91 µmPixel pitch13.91 µm
193.6 µm²Pixel area193.6 µm²
0.52 MP/cm²Pixel density0.52 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
118 gWeight136 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The e-mini D and e-mini M have the same sensor area. The e-mini D has the lighter body. The e-mini D and e-mini M have the same effective resolution. The e-mini D and e-mini M were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose e-mini M
Released in 2001, e-mini M has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 136 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.