CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica-Minolta Dynax 7D
vs Samsung GX-10

Archive illustration for Konica-Minolta Dynax 7D

Konica-Minolta / 2004

Dynax 7D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung GX-10

Samsung / 2006

GX-10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
Dynax 7D
369 mm²
GX-10
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Dynax 7D and GX-10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Dynax 7DMetricGX-10
6.31 MPEffective pixels10 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
7.65 µmPixel pitch6.07 µm
58.47 µm²Pixel area36.89 µm²
1.71 MP/cm²Pixel density2.71 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
760 gWeight793 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type IIStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Dynax 7D and GX-10 have the same sensor area. The Dynax 7D has the lighter body. The GX-10 has the higher effective resolution. The GX-10 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Dynax 7D

Released in 2004, Dynax 7D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.31 MP effective resolution, and a 760 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GX-10

Released in 2006, GX-10 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 793 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras