Reasons to choose DG-2
Released in 2001, DG-2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 425 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-2
vs Konica Revio KD-200Z
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-221 mm²
Revio KD-200Z- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DG-2 and Revio KD-200Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DG-2MetricRevio KD-200Z
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
425 gWeight227 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DG-2 and Revio KD-200Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-200Z has the lighter body. The DG-2 and Revio KD-200Z have the same effective resolution. The DG-2 and Revio KD-200Z were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-200Z
Released in 2001, Revio KD-200Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.