Reasons to choose QV-R3
Released in 2002, QV-R3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-R3
vs Casio QV-R4
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
QV-R338 mm²
QV-R4- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-R3 and QV-R4 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
QV-R3MetricQV-R4
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
240 gWeight200 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-R3 and QV-R4 have the same sensor area. The QV-R4 has the lighter body. The QV-R4 has the higher effective resolution. The QV-R3 and QV-R4 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R4
Released in 2002, QV-R4 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.