Reasons to choose EOS 300D
Released in 2003, EOS 300D has about 343 mm² of sensor area, 6.3 MP effective resolution, and a 645 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS 300D
vs Kodak DCS760
VS
Sensor area
343 mm²
EOS 300D510 mm²
DCS760- Area ratio
- 1.49:1
- Absolute difference
- 167 mm²
- Relative difference
- 48.7%
The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EOS 300DMetricDCS760
6.3 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
22.7 × 15.1Sensor27.65 × 18.43
7.38 µmPixel pitch9.14 µm
54.41 µm²Pixel area83.54 µm²
1.84 MP/cm²Pixel density1.2 MP/cm²
1.59Crop factor1.3
—Maximum video—
645 gWeight1,860 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStoragePCMCIA (2 x type II / 1 x type III)
Canon 1100mAh Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryKodak NiMH
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCS760 has the larger sensor area. The EOS 300D has the lighter body. The EOS 300D has the higher effective resolution. The EOS 300D is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCS760
Released in 2001, DCS760 has about 510 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,860 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.