CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ GH200
vs BenQ LM100

Archive illustration for BenQ GH200

BenQ / 2012

GH200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ LM100

BenQ / 2012

LM100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
GH200
28 mm²
LM100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The GH200 and LM100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

GH200MetricLM100
14.1 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.02 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.54 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
—Storage—
—Battery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The GH200 and LM100 have the same sensor area. The GH200 and LM100 have the same body weight. The GH200 has the higher effective resolution. The GH200 and LM100 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GH200

Released in 2012, GH200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose LM100

Released in 2012, LM100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras