Reasons to choose Optima 105
Released in 2010, Optima 105 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 105
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 3
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10528 mm²
Optima 3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 105 and Optima 3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Optima 105MetricOptima 3
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight146 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 105 and Optima 3 have the same sensor area. The Optima 105 has the lighter body. The Optima 105 and Optima 3 have the same effective resolution. The Optima 3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 3
Released in 2011, Optima 3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 146 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.