Reasons to choose Optima 100
Released in 2009, Optima 100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 100
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 1338mT
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10028 mm²
Optima 1338mT- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Optima 1338mT has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Optima 100MetricOptima 1338mT
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 1338mT has the larger sensor area. The Optima 100 has the lighter body. The Optima 100 and Optima 1338mT have the same effective resolution. The Optima 100 and Optima 1338mT were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 1338mT
Released in 2009, Optima 1338mT has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.