CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto DC-833m
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 830UW

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-833m

AgfaPhoto / 2009

DC-833m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 830UW

AgfaPhoto / 2009

Optima 830UW

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC-833m
25 mm²
Optima 830UW
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC-833m and Optima 830UW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC-833mMetricOptima 830UW
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight158 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC-833m and Optima 830UW have the same sensor area. The DC-833m has the lighter body. The DC-833m and Optima 830UW have the same effective resolution. The DC-833m and Optima 830UW were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC-833m

Released in 2009, DC-833m has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optima 830UW

Released in 2009, Optima 830UW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 158 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras