Reasons to choose WB200F
Released in 2013, WB200F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 226 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung WB200F
vs Samsung WB250F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
WB200F28 mm²
WB250F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The WB200F and WB250F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
WB200FMetricWB250F
14.2 MPEffective pixels14.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
2 µm²Pixel area2 µm²
49.9 MP/cm²Pixel density49.9 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
226 gWeight226 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The WB200F and WB250F have the same sensor area. The WB200F and WB250F have the same body weight. The WB200F and WB250F have the same effective resolution. The WB200F and WB250F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB250F
Released in 2013, WB250F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 226 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.