Reasons to choose EX2F
Released in 2012, EX2F has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 294 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung EX2F
vs Samsung WB150F
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
EX2F28 mm²
WB150F- Area ratio
- 1.49:1
- Absolute difference
- 14 mm²
- Relative difference
- 49.2%
The EX2F has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EX2FMetricWB150F
12.4 MPEffective pixels14.2 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
3.42 µm²Pixel area2 µm²
29.2 MP/cm²Pixel density49.9 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,280 × 720
294 gWeight341 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion SLB-10A battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EX2F has the larger sensor area. The EX2F has the lighter body. The WB150F has the higher effective resolution. The EX2F and WB150F were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB150F
Released in 2012, WB150F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.