CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei RCP-8325X
vs Rollei RCP-8427XW

Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-8325X

Rollei / 2007

RCP-8325X

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-8427XW

Rollei / 2008

RCP-8427XW

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
RCP-8325X
25 mm²
RCP-8427XW
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The RCP-8325X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

RCP-8325XMetricRCP-8427XW
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.18 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight132 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RCP-8325X has the larger sensor area. The RCP-8325X has the lighter body. The RCP-8325X and RCP-8427XW have the same effective resolution. The RCP-8427XW is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose RCP-8325X

Released in 2007, RCP-8325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-8427XW

Released in 2008, RCP-8427XW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 132 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras