Reasons to choose dp 300
Released in 2003, dp 300 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dp 300
vs Rollei dt 3200
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dp 30025 mm²
dt 3200- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The dt 3200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dp 300Metricdt 3200
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.25 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.76 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area7.64 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density13.08 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dt 3200 has the larger sensor area. The dt 3200 has the lighter body. The dt 3200 has the higher effective resolution. The dp 300 and dt 3200 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dt 3200
Released in 2003, dt 3200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.