CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dcx 400
vs Rollei Prego da6

Archive illustration for Rollei dcx 400

Rollei / 2004

dcx 400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego da6

Rollei / 2004

Prego da6

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dcx 400
38 mm²
Prego da6
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dcx 400 and Prego da6 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dcx 400MetricPrego da6
4 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight170 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dcx 400 and Prego da6 have the same sensor area. The dcx 400 has the lighter body. The Prego da6 has the higher effective resolution. The dcx 400 and Prego da6 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dcx 400

Released in 2004, dcx 400 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego da6

Released in 2004, Prego da6 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 170 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras