Reasons to choose ZR
Released in 2025, ZR has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 24.5 MP effective resolution, and a 630 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon ZR
vs Sigma BF
VS
Sensor area
858 mm²
ZR858 mm²
BF- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ZR and BF have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ZRMetricBF
24.5 MPEffective pixels24.6 MP
35.9 × 23.9Sensor35.9 × 23.9
5.92 µmPixel pitch5.91 µm
35.02 µm²Pixel area34.88 µm²
2.86 MP/cm²Pixel density2.87 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
6,048 × 3,402Maximum video6,016 × 3,384
630 gWeight446 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC, CFexpress Type B / XQDStorageInternal storage
EN‑EL15c rechargeable Li-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-81 Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ZR and BF have the same sensor area. The BF has the lighter body. The BF has the higher effective resolution. The ZR and BF were both released in 2025. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose BF
Released in 2025, BF has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 24.6 MP effective resolution, and a 446 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.