Reasons to choose DiMAGE Xg
Released in 2004, DiMAGE Xg has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica-Minolta DiMAGE Xg
vs Praktica DCZ 2.2
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DiMAGE Xg21 mm²
DCZ 2.2- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DiMAGE Xg and DCZ 2.2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DiMAGE XgMetricDCZ 2.2
3.1 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight310 g
SD/MMC cardStorageCompactFlash type I
Lithium-Ion (NP-200) Li-ion batteryBattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DiMAGE Xg and DCZ 2.2 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE Xg has the lighter body. The DiMAGE Xg has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE Xg is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCZ 2.2
Released in 2002, DCZ 2.2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.