Reasons to choose DG-3Z
Released in 2003, DG-3Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-3Z
vs Konica Revio KD-3300Z
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-3Z25 mm²
Revio KD-3300Z- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The Revio KD-3300Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DG-3ZMetricRevio KD-3300Z
3.24 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.57 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
6.58 µm²Pixel area8.01 µm²
15.2 MP/cm²Pixel density12.48 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight200 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Revio KD-3300Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio KD-3300Z has the lighter body. The DG-3Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-3300Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio KD-3300Z
Released in 2004, Revio KD-3300Z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.