Reasons to choose EasyShare CD90
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 129 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare CD90
vs Kodak EasyShare M320
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare CD9025 mm²
EasyShare M320- Area ratio
- 1.12:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 11.6%
The EasyShare CD90 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare CD90MetricEasyShare M320
12 MPEffective pixels9.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.7 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density37.04 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
129 gWeight155 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryRechargeable KLIC-7001 Battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CD90 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare CD90 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD90 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare CD90 and EasyShare M320 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M320
Released in 2009, EasyShare M320 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.