Reasons to choose DC3200
Released in 2000, DC3200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC3200
vs Kodak DC4800
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
DC320040 mm²
DC4800- Area ratio
- 1.07:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 7%
The DC3200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC3200MetricDC4800
0.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.87 µmPixel pitch3.58 µm
47.19 µm²Pixel area12.8 µm²
2.12 MP/cm²Pixel density7.81 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight320 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC3200 has the larger sensor area. The DC3200 has the lighter body. The DC4800 has the higher effective resolution. The DC3200 and DC4800 were both released in 2000. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC4800
Released in 2000, DC4800 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.