Reasons to choose Photosmart R827
Released in 2006, Photosmart R827 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart R827
vs HP Photosmart R967
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Photosmart R82738 mm²
Photosmart R967- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The Photosmart R967 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Photosmart R827MetricPhotosmart R967
7.2 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.94 µm
3.45 µm²Pixel area3.75 µm²
28.99 MP/cm²Pixel density26.65 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight190 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart R967 has the larger sensor area. The Photosmart R827 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R967 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R827 and Photosmart R967 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart R967
Released in 2006, Photosmart R967 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.