Reasons to choose DS-300
Released in 1997, DS-300 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 700 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm DS-300
vs Nikon E2n
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
DS-30058 mm²
E2n- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DS-300 and E2n have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DS-300MetricE2n
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.4 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.96 µmPixel pitch6.44 µm
48.4 µm²Pixel area41.49 µm²
2.07 MP/cm²Pixel density2.41 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
700 gWeight—
PCMCIA (type I or II)Storage—
Lithium-Ion (NP-510) Li-ion batteryBatteryNiMH accu
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DS-300 and E2n have the same sensor area. The E2n has the lighter body. The E2n has the higher effective resolution. The DS-300 and E2n were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E2n
Released in 1997, E2n has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.