Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3040AF
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 3040AF has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 3040AF
vs Concord Eye-Q 3340z
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q 3040AF21 mm²
Eye-Q 3340z- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 9 mm²
- Relative difference
- 44.1%
The Eye-Q 3040AF has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 3040AFMetricEye-Q 3340z
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.33 × 4
3.15 µmPixel pitch2.58 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area6.66 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density15.01 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 3040AF has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 3040AF has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 3340z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 3040AF and Eye-Q 3340z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3340z
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 3340z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.