Reasons to choose QV-R61
Released in 2004, QV-R61 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-R61
vs Casio QV-R62
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
QV-R6138 mm²
QV-R62- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-R61 and QV-R62 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
QV-R61MetricQV-R62
6 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
168 gWeight168 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH included)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-R61 and QV-R62 have the same sensor area. The QV-R61 and QV-R62 have the same body weight. The QV-R61 and QV-R62 have the same effective resolution. The QV-R61 and QV-R62 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R62
Released in 2004, QV-R62 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.