Reasons to choose QV-R52
Released in 2005, QV-R52 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.25 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-R52
vs Casio QV-R61
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
QV-R5238 mm²
QV-R61- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-R52 and QV-R61 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
QV-R52MetricQV-R61
5.25 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
7.22 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
13.85 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
168 gWeight168 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH included)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-R52 and QV-R61 have the same sensor area. The QV-R52 and QV-R61 have the same body weight. The QV-R61 has the higher effective resolution. The QV-R52 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R61
Released in 2004, QV-R61 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.